First we find out that Walt finds tight pussies uncomfortable. Now we find out his own foreskin is too tight for his dick. Walt suffers from wang claustrophobia.
Walt, this was just an aside about the '50s housewives, but do you think you have a piece in you about suburban atomization? I think it would be quite culturally healthy to have more right-wingers be a part of the urbanism discourse, and to have more of y'all move into big cities to counteract the geographical polarization of the urban/rural divide. And the whole issue is definitely very intertwined with the right's human capital problem.
Also: "I don't know any fat people. Except for you." 🔥 Kudos, Sophie.
Men like him love power but hate being comfortable. You have to bully them a little. When you called gently him fat, I was like “this girl is a genius”
"Gender essentialism and trans ideology vs. social constructivism"
On this score, Sophie seems to overlook the phenomenology of the body and has adopted certain Cartesian presuppositions. Much of our identity is inextricably linked to the bodies we are given. To say that a male with his current brain wakes up in a different female body would, in principle, no longer make him the same person (and, I would argue, conflates mind and brain as equivalent). We are our bodies. We can't just transfer our consciousness willy-nilly like it’s code. Framing a hypothetical like this forces one to accept the presupposition that the mind can be transplanted because it alone constitutes our true essence. I reject that premise.
There is something revealing about the fact that transgender individuals attempt to artificially alter their bodies. This is because, at a fundamental level, our bodies and our given nature reveal who and what we are. The artificiality is an imposition of a will that rejects itself, falling into Kierkegaardian despair—the despair of not wanting to be oneself, compounded by ignorance of being in despair at all. In this reimagined artificial construction, the "new" body superficially reinforces the despair. Outwardly, and perhaps even in the gaze of others, one might appear female which bolsters one’s perception of one's own identity. However, the fakeness of the altered body deceives the mind into believing it is female. But the difference still remains as one consciously is reminded of the trans modifier (e.g. trans-man, trans-woman), for the body naturally rejects—or at the very least fails to produce on its own, and not because of some defect—that which makes a man or woman a biological reality.
In defense of the thought experiment, one might argue that while I can reject its hypothetical presuppositions theoretically, there are actually existing people who DO genuinely feel their bodies are at odds with who they are. This disconnect, so they argue, is why the body fails to inform the individual of his or her true identity. My response to this argument would be that such cases are analogous to body dysmorphia (a point Walt touched on but neglected to push hard enough on), compounded by a host of other factors—cultural or otherwise—that perpetuate different strains of Cartesian thought. Indeed, people with body dysmorphia reject their body as they perceive it to be, not as it actually is. They obsessively distort how they see themselves, but their body remains objectively the same, and their condition is treated as a misalignment of perception not proof that their body is fundamentally "wrong." Trans ideology, by contrast, insists that the body itself is the problem and must be artificially imposed upon to align with the mind’s perception. This is a Cartesian reversal: privileging the subjective perception of the mind over the objective reality of the body.
I know this topic was treated briefly in a podcast spanning a ton of subjects, but I couldn’t help sperging out here.
Unlike Tyson/Paul, this one lived up to the hype. Not exactly pugilism, but certainly more of a contest than most podcasts where parties vigorously seek common ground - a battle of the sexes in the classic tradition. Sophie was usually the aggressor in the bout, with her surprisingly tiny little voice, probing Walt’s defenses with logic and good-natured attacks on his manhood, morality, sexuality, and physique. He defended well, relying primarily on factual knowledge of a broad range of topics and courageous levels of self-revelation - eg, we are all now familiar with the elasticity of his foreskin.
Too close to call, even for the judges. I say let’s run it back: Bismarck v Sophie 2 in 2025
Rare that I listen to a full 3hr podcast anymore but I found this incredibly captiviting. Something going on that I can't quite describe but it is extremely engaging.
"That's like my bio. You should know that." This is already my favorite episode and it's only been like 30 seconds
Hahahaha ❤️
First we find out that Walt finds tight pussies uncomfortable. Now we find out his own foreskin is too tight for his dick. Walt suffers from wang claustrophobia.
Hahaha this made me laugh. Also, idk why I said I didn’t know you, of course I know who you are! I just associate you with the name Kate
This was a wild one.
This is nothing compared to the next ones
Walt, this was just an aside about the '50s housewives, but do you think you have a piece in you about suburban atomization? I think it would be quite culturally healthy to have more right-wingers be a part of the urbanism discourse, and to have more of y'all move into big cities to counteract the geographical polarization of the urban/rural divide. And the whole issue is definitely very intertwined with the right's human capital problem.
Also: "I don't know any fat people. Except for you." 🔥 Kudos, Sophie.
The disappointment in Walt’s voice when Sophie said she doesn’t call people “goyim” was the best moment.
He just wants to be degraded so badly
Men like him love power but hate being comfortable. You have to bully them a little. When you called gently him fat, I was like “this girl is a genius”
Hahaha yesss you get it
Ugh, I was going to be on time for work today but now I have to drive in circles for two hours.
Please let us know what you think, but also don’t crash your car in the process 😅
Great chemistry between the two of you. As Bismarck said, a Jewish mare and German stallion produce dynamite.
Walt’s first time on the Freudian casting couch
Walt you are a disgrace to goyhood!
A shanda! oiy!
"Gender essentialism and trans ideology vs. social constructivism"
On this score, Sophie seems to overlook the phenomenology of the body and has adopted certain Cartesian presuppositions. Much of our identity is inextricably linked to the bodies we are given. To say that a male with his current brain wakes up in a different female body would, in principle, no longer make him the same person (and, I would argue, conflates mind and brain as equivalent). We are our bodies. We can't just transfer our consciousness willy-nilly like it’s code. Framing a hypothetical like this forces one to accept the presupposition that the mind can be transplanted because it alone constitutes our true essence. I reject that premise.
There is something revealing about the fact that transgender individuals attempt to artificially alter their bodies. This is because, at a fundamental level, our bodies and our given nature reveal who and what we are. The artificiality is an imposition of a will that rejects itself, falling into Kierkegaardian despair—the despair of not wanting to be oneself, compounded by ignorance of being in despair at all. In this reimagined artificial construction, the "new" body superficially reinforces the despair. Outwardly, and perhaps even in the gaze of others, one might appear female which bolsters one’s perception of one's own identity. However, the fakeness of the altered body deceives the mind into believing it is female. But the difference still remains as one consciously is reminded of the trans modifier (e.g. trans-man, trans-woman), for the body naturally rejects—or at the very least fails to produce on its own, and not because of some defect—that which makes a man or woman a biological reality.
In defense of the thought experiment, one might argue that while I can reject its hypothetical presuppositions theoretically, there are actually existing people who DO genuinely feel their bodies are at odds with who they are. This disconnect, so they argue, is why the body fails to inform the individual of his or her true identity. My response to this argument would be that such cases are analogous to body dysmorphia (a point Walt touched on but neglected to push hard enough on), compounded by a host of other factors—cultural or otherwise—that perpetuate different strains of Cartesian thought. Indeed, people with body dysmorphia reject their body as they perceive it to be, not as it actually is. They obsessively distort how they see themselves, but their body remains objectively the same, and their condition is treated as a misalignment of perception not proof that their body is fundamentally "wrong." Trans ideology, by contrast, insists that the body itself is the problem and must be artificially imposed upon to align with the mind’s perception. This is a Cartesian reversal: privileging the subjective perception of the mind over the objective reality of the body.
I know this topic was treated briefly in a podcast spanning a ton of subjects, but I couldn’t help sperging out here.
You two should release a masterclass on flirting. I don't think I got anything substantive out of this podcast, but the dynamic was enjoyable
You really do have molested girl voice
Unlike Tyson/Paul, this one lived up to the hype. Not exactly pugilism, but certainly more of a contest than most podcasts where parties vigorously seek common ground - a battle of the sexes in the classic tradition. Sophie was usually the aggressor in the bout, with her surprisingly tiny little voice, probing Walt’s defenses with logic and good-natured attacks on his manhood, morality, sexuality, and physique. He defended well, relying primarily on factual knowledge of a broad range of topics and courageous levels of self-revelation - eg, we are all now familiar with the elasticity of his foreskin.
Too close to call, even for the judges. I say let’s run it back: Bismarck v Sophie 2 in 2025
Rare that I listen to a full 3hr podcast anymore but I found this incredibly captiviting. Something going on that I can't quite describe but it is extremely engaging.
Same, but I know what’s going on and it’s her damn voice.
This is gonna be very intereting thanks Walt for this upload.
Walt is Jewish at this point.
As a right wing Jewish zoomer..welcome!