2 Comments
User's avatar
sunshine moonlight's avatar

Was that Arcto at the end?

Dialgatime321's avatar

I listened to this mediocre piece.

Not awful.

Tbh the things that piss me off most about you are your wannabe elite economic views, your megascabbing to male autists, your wannabe elite stuff in general, you claiming you value hierarchy qua hierarchy when you clearly don't (and good thing too), yes your focus on status to the point of selling out morality for it/tolerance of as the leftists say "systemic injustice", your claim to tolerance of indirect social conflict when that's exactly what makes modern life so unbearable essentially (legalizing dueling would be great and infinitely better than the "vitalism" of letigious karens suing men for perceived weakness or faux paus)...

But damn you have a Promethean spirit and imagination!

However, over time, status eugenics inevitably leads to status quo defense force, because ultimately, resultant power is in fact in the current crop of Judeo-Anglo-Brahmin neoliberal rulers- the residual Epstein class & their offspring. After all, eugenics is about power measured on incalculable axes of competence- such thay the only meaningful measure of deserve or eu at a social system level is literally always whomever currently has power to exactly the extent they currently do.

Intellectual Eugenics without some moral or at least aesthetic principle outside easily co-optable "90s" type aesthetics does have a longterm tendency towards Spencer-Hananism.

The Christcucks are correct about that at least, even if their motives are fundamentally essentially nefarious.

Sure, as Destiny has taught us, view from nowhere "nihilistic" secular nothing but pragmatism is ideal for a public-facing defense in an internet debate environment, but an internal locus of valuing something niche, obscure, & difficult or borderline impossible to defend to the masses is necessary if one is autistic and intelligent enough to piece together the longterm logical trajectory of all the popular value systems on Earth right now (possibly ever) and where they each independently, if taken consistently, inevitably lead (nowhere good, for somewhat different reasons for all of them).

But our autistic brains can't as easily actually believe in hypocrisy so easily, so to not go insane or become a generic partisan for something with coal outcomes at its end we have to irrelevancymaxx in terms of internal beliefs IMO. IMO wayyy more public figures do this internally than would ever public admit by definition, the only question is how large the %? Probably still a somewhat small minority unfortunately, but not completely irrelevant.

Few other things would explain some of the frustration and angst one sees.

But the truly trustworthy men who I would really trust to not sell out are over represented among schizophrenic nobody anons screeching into the wind year after year to zero or one like.

This is not due to their lack of power but rather our system is (accidentally or not) so totalizingly effective in ensuring those with the actual internal tools sufficient to actually threaten the familiar order of things in the millennia-long arc cannot gain a large enough following to win enough to ackshually win.

This will drive pretty much anybody earnestly interested in making the world a better place insane/mentally ill (mindraping oneself completely and going full normie counts as this).

I don't know why I typed this out. Maybe so you and hopefully others can understand where I'm coming from a bit better.