Pro-lifers are murdering babies
When a baby's life is at stake, it's not the thought that counts
My opinion on abortion has always been the same:
Keep it legal on demand up to the point of viability (or some similar threshold) and then ban it thereafter, with exceptions for rape, incest, and genetic health defects.
It seems obvious to me that abortion in the eighth month is no different from infanticide, just as it seems obvious that abortion in the first few weeks is completely different from infanticide.
My moral intuition says it would be equally wrong to permit elective abortion up to the point of birth (which actually does happen thanks to sickos like this) as it would be to prohibit abortion in the early stages of pregnancy (when the vast majority of terminations take place, most of which are socially necessary).
For a long time this reasonable and enlightened centrist position was also the opinion of the median American voter, and until today I had assumed that it was still the median view. But it turns out this is false—I am now quite conservative on abortion, because the median voter has become a pro-choice maximalist. They now support an absolute right to abortion on demand up to the point of birth.
See that shift after Roe was overturned? For that you can thank GOP overreach at the state level and pathetically incompetent Republican messaging.
The GOP made no attempt to sell their views on abortion to the broader American electorate, and simply blind-sided us with restrictions out of step with actual preferences on the ground. This let the Dems take control of the narrative, and they wasted no time digging up pregnant preteen rape victims to make a cause célèbre.
As a consequence, a sizeable cohort of marginal voters have abandoned my enlightened centrist position and instead have adopted pro choice maximalism. They are so disgusted with Republican extremism that they’ve begun the accept the theoretical murder of near-infants if it means stripping pro-lifers of power.
This is very obviously a complete and utter disaster, and the pro-life movement should be ashamed of itself. By pushing for overreaching restrictions on early abortions or birth control that could never be sustained and were obviously going to provoke a massive thermostatic backlash against them, pro-lifers have likely doomed tens of thousands of viable babies to death over the next few decades.
This was easily predictable and could have been avoided. John Roberts warned conservatives not to go down this path; he wanted to take Roe apart piecemeal, boiling the frog slowly over time, so inattentive and high time preference liberals wouldn’t catch on. That could have worked, but you fundamentalist chuds ruined the plan because you just *had* to impose your will on everyone *right this moment*. You couldn’t even wait to ensure the longevity of your own policy, and because of your impulsiveness the country is now a-okay with killing babies.
How the hell is anyone supposed to join a coalition with you fundies? How can we trust you to help other factions in the party achieve our goals when you can’t even exercise sufficient restraint and strategy to achieve your own?
You have blood on your hands, pro-lifers. Baby blood.
Shame on you.
Your rate of productivity is astounding.
In addition to what you note, other countries have liberalized abortion laws in response to Dobbs and the aftermath. France recently constitutionally enshrined it, and Macron as well as the Spanish PM tweeted their concerns about the decision. RBG said that Roe imposing abortion legalization nationwide in one fell swoop made the issue controversial and polarized. Dobbs seems to have had the same effect in the opposite direction (even beyond the US).
Another excellent take, and I'm glad to see someone else who won't ignore their moral intuitions. I'd far prefer programs which try to make it easier for women to discover that they're pregnant early so that they can make that decision at a time that's less morally objectionable. I honestly don't know though how a woman doesn't figure that out after a month if she's been having periods since the onset of puberty; as a man, even I thought missing a period was cause to go to see an OBGYN.
Also I wanted to justify your placing of some of the blame on conservatives for the baby murders that will result. Just as we would blame someone who imposed rent control for subsequent housing shortages, we can also blame conservatives for the unintended consequences of their actions such as babies getting killed — even including drug war issues, which are similar in nature to prohibition era issues.
I've been noticing this trend where conservatives let things go bad by just minding their own business and ceding ground within elite institutions, and then they get angry and impose their wishes in an authoritative manner because they don't want to do the work to actually fix things. This of course turns people away because of psychological reactance, despite most people being willing to be authoritarian about the things they care about. Then the culture changes on account of this, and the conservatives of today become the liberals of yesterday.