I read about seventy percent of this. Not bad, all the gender awareness coming out at once, but maybe consider the possibility that so many men are “incels” because their fathers had no authority over them. It has not always been like this, having to cull 20-30% of each generation of males because useless. This is the first generation in history where women had anything resembling real authority, and they don’t have a clue what they’re doing, so don’t confuse social collapse with normal.
And I don’t agree about the argument on male uselessness.
In my experience you have to scrap the bottom of the barrel to find truly useless men. I think many of them are in prison or something similar and the rest just do random shit that are enough to survive.
If I were to listen to my mother who robbed my father of any authority, he is a dumb useless man.
Yet the man has terraformed over 20k square meters of lands on 3 different properties, starting from basically abandoned state and has renovated/repair so many things it would take a day to list. He has hold his director/manager job for over 40 years, being responsible for everything from payroll to investment choices, with a team reaching 40 people at times.
But according to my mother he is a useless bad man.
Women are so full of shit it makes perfect sense that they had no rights before. Funny thing is that they are working very hard to bring that back. They are like kids pushing on the limits to finally suffer rules of authority so that they can feel taken care off.
One of the best things I read on this site. Ignore the criticism towards your convoluted and heavy style, it's great and original and it should be studied on universities all around the angloshphere
Hey Walt, looking to understand your perspective on this side of the "late bloomer ick":
I've read substacks like yours that claim women engage in a lot of in-group conformity.
If you share that belief, why can't that in-group conformity be utilized to make women as a group understand that when they are so rejecting of "incel"/late bloomer types, they are effectively just discriminating against a class of mostly autistic men?
Wouldn't this be especially effective amongst the artsy liberal women that you mention?
I understand if you think there is a basic, biological element to the rejection, but I'm thinking of this as a modern way of getting those numbers back up to around the '50s level.
Actually it is kinda good they discriminate against them. Those guys end up doing their own thing to maximize their value and they become extremely valuable in their mid 30s onward. It benefits society and it benefits those men. And then they can look down on those women who underestimated them with well deserved contempt.
A man who gets a woman too easily too early end up not maximizing his value and is often to be found in arrested development around the same age. From my experience, very often those men regret not having try harder alone for longer, because they could have gotten much better if they had.
I struggle to parse your prose, but, with the help of an AI translator into Gen X speak, I'm in heated agreement with your hot take. Intersectionality is an Ouroboros that will eventually destroy itself. But, I'm not sure how long this will endure.
Sure, biological women, especially White women, are now an oppressor class, soon to be treated like White men by the leftists. But, those White women tend to vote their identity -- not their long term self-interest. And, as long as women are the median voter and women continue to shift to the left, we're in for an Orwellian future hellscape.
We haven't hit bottom yet. Not sure when we will. Fourth Turning thesis seems to predict some time between 2027 and 2033. We'll need a crisis to hit that timeline, which means you should expect some sort of acceleration event.to force a capitulation. Keep your head on a swivel.
I’m liking for feet
Final pic is 👌
I read about seventy percent of this. Not bad, all the gender awareness coming out at once, but maybe consider the possibility that so many men are “incels” because their fathers had no authority over them. It has not always been like this, having to cull 20-30% of each generation of males because useless. This is the first generation in history where women had anything resembling real authority, and they don’t have a clue what they’re doing, so don’t confuse social collapse with normal.
Yep, that’s pretty much it.
And I don’t agree about the argument on male uselessness.
In my experience you have to scrap the bottom of the barrel to find truly useless men. I think many of them are in prison or something similar and the rest just do random shit that are enough to survive.
If I were to listen to my mother who robbed my father of any authority, he is a dumb useless man.
Yet the man has terraformed over 20k square meters of lands on 3 different properties, starting from basically abandoned state and has renovated/repair so many things it would take a day to list. He has hold his director/manager job for over 40 years, being responsible for everything from payroll to investment choices, with a team reaching 40 people at times.
But according to my mother he is a useless bad man.
Women are so full of shit it makes perfect sense that they had no rights before. Funny thing is that they are working very hard to bring that back. They are like kids pushing on the limits to finally suffer rules of authority so that they can feel taken care off.
One of the best things I read on this site. Ignore the criticism towards your convoluted and heavy style, it's great and original and it should be studied on universities all around the angloshphere
I suppose if you ever came across Shakespeare in your benighted ramblings you might have heard it said that brevity is the soul of wit
#Repealthe19thWorldwide includes no women holding political offices or serving on juries.
Hey Walt, looking to understand your perspective on this side of the "late bloomer ick":
I've read substacks like yours that claim women engage in a lot of in-group conformity.
If you share that belief, why can't that in-group conformity be utilized to make women as a group understand that when they are so rejecting of "incel"/late bloomer types, they are effectively just discriminating against a class of mostly autistic men?
Wouldn't this be especially effective amongst the artsy liberal women that you mention?
I understand if you think there is a basic, biological element to the rejection, but I'm thinking of this as a modern way of getting those numbers back up to around the '50s level.
Actually it is kinda good they discriminate against them. Those guys end up doing their own thing to maximize their value and they become extremely valuable in their mid 30s onward. It benefits society and it benefits those men. And then they can look down on those women who underestimated them with well deserved contempt.
A man who gets a woman too easily too early end up not maximizing his value and is often to be found in arrested development around the same age. From my experience, very often those men regret not having try harder alone for longer, because they could have gotten much better if they had.
I struggle to parse your prose, but, with the help of an AI translator into Gen X speak, I'm in heated agreement with your hot take. Intersectionality is an Ouroboros that will eventually destroy itself. But, I'm not sure how long this will endure.
Sure, biological women, especially White women, are now an oppressor class, soon to be treated like White men by the leftists. But, those White women tend to vote their identity -- not their long term self-interest. And, as long as women are the median voter and women continue to shift to the left, we're in for an Orwellian future hellscape.
We haven't hit bottom yet. Not sure when we will. Fourth Turning thesis seems to predict some time between 2027 and 2033. We'll need a crisis to hit that timeline, which means you should expect some sort of acceleration event.to force a capitulation. Keep your head on a swivel.