6 Comments
User's avatar
Anuradha Pandey's avatar

Well I’m touched that I influenced any part of your corpus. But also take this as a compliment — I actually often struggle to keep track of your concepts because you legit write like PhD students in the social sciences are taught.

ArbitraryUsername's avatar

W high ceiling verbal IQ item drop

Ponti Min's avatar

My main advice would be to write in a much less obscure style.

For example I have very little idea what most of this means:

> Functionalist Nominalism, conative realism and thick precognitivism, adaptive sincerity and endogenous preference, the Other Gap / Mythopoetic Hobbesianism / Sapir-Whorf-Bismarck hypothesis, status realism and photonegative power dynamics, Tripartite Dignity Theory

Walt Bismarck's avatar

read and u will find out

Ponti Min's avatar

So on page 1 we have:

> Hermeneutic: A portable interpretive schema that converts recurring situated experience into reusable distinctions, propositions, compressions, causal models, expectations, or rules of action, helping to determine what is present, which differences matter, what recurrence deserves a name, what should be compared, and what consequences follow from the interpretation.

and:

> Actor: The operative constituency of a hermeneutic; a locus of interpretation, conation, memory, or action sufficiently persistent for one representation to bear upon another through time.

Are you familiar with Orwell's *Politics and the English Language* by any chance?

Ben L.'s avatar

Shouldn't it be *Mein Kampf Too?*

(Electric Boogaloo optional)