> "tbh I’d be a hell of a lot happier in practice if I had a ~120 IQ like most of you fags."
> "Retvrn To Monke sort of does make sense, and Teddy K was directionally quite astute."
I am probably just too low IQ to get it, but if your world view of raw power and realpolitic are true as well as being an unquestionably high status braintrust word cell as well, then I can't imagine how you would be so nihilistic. If both are true you should be at the tiny strata at the top of the system where the whole totem poll of morallistic faggotry and asthetic narrative would be the matrix control system that you can lord over to keep all the lesser mortals down while drowning you in pussy.
... I mean, those viewpoints are reconcialable if you also had like a bleeding heart wish for a fair world for all the lesser mere mortals of ~120 IQ or less so very far beneith you, but just look at you, any such claim is obvious BS.
Great piece though, the above is about my only quarrel with its excellence.
The pinnacle of that system isn't the 145 IQ wordcel. It's the 120 IQ dark triad nigga who can act impulsively and lie his ass off without any cognitive load. Unless you want to be a chess grandmaster or theoretical physicist or write weird mythopoetic screeds on the internet then IQ is not what you want to optimize for at all, which is lowkey kind of the main thesis here in a roundabout way.
Wait, but if we accept the foundation of the system is just “governing” narratives and accepted “truths” and morality frameworks, then even if those are currently optomized to 120 IQ dark triad people, the framework itself is editable by the 145 IQ mythopoetic writers, because that is how such frameworks are made.
For a lame metaphore, if this is an MMO and the 120 IQ dark triads are the maxed out players, the 145 IQ mythopetic writers should be the devs and the sysadmins. Its a more subtle and indirect power in regards to the actual game, sure, but it is ultimately the freater power as it long-term defines the game itself.
Tiptop explanatory and predictive power - you, sir, are a credit to your fellow man. I would also add a sort of complex/systems psychology/Jungian angle that comes to mind. Essentially, it is possible to have a different degrees of agency and Will in different circumstances or aspects of life. For instance, a woman could be incredibly diachronically agentic with regards to money and finances (perhaps due to her combination of intelligence, upbringing, prior trauma, or fear) but remain a teenager vis-a-vis romantic entanglements, which is of course the main subject here and the most energetically-charged, basal aspect of the psyche (right after basic survival).
I have a hell of a difficult time understanding you. I'm a shape rotator - not a wordcel So, I copy and paste your posts into Ai and ask it to help me understand. The translation may not be perfect, but, assuming it is reasonably accurate, your assessment is spot on target, so very coherent.
I suspect you write in the way you do because, in part, you want to be inaccessible. I don't understand the tactic. Maybe it is a status signal. Discussing these topics is inherently low status. So, maybe it makes sense to obfuscate in order to appear higher status?
Also true: that’s one amoral, dishonest, lazy bitch — and I’m relieved it never progressed farther than it did. Her punishment will be lifelong loneliness and despair
It's interesting how this piece approaches the concept of female agency. How does a framework centered on game theory contribute to fostering geniune, equitable relationships built on mutual respect and accountability for all individuals?
This shit is brilliant. You should be proud of yourself. I want to pin this shit to my wall
My favorite article. Will listen through again.
Most feminist would 1000% agree according to their lines of argument and logic yet they will never admit it...
What if we just did eugenics to ensure that the average woman has mild Aspergers, and thus is capable of logically coherent agentic thinking?
> "tbh I’d be a hell of a lot happier in practice if I had a ~120 IQ like most of you fags."
> "Retvrn To Monke sort of does make sense, and Teddy K was directionally quite astute."
I am probably just too low IQ to get it, but if your world view of raw power and realpolitic are true as well as being an unquestionably high status braintrust word cell as well, then I can't imagine how you would be so nihilistic. If both are true you should be at the tiny strata at the top of the system where the whole totem poll of morallistic faggotry and asthetic narrative would be the matrix control system that you can lord over to keep all the lesser mortals down while drowning you in pussy.
... I mean, those viewpoints are reconcialable if you also had like a bleeding heart wish for a fair world for all the lesser mere mortals of ~120 IQ or less so very far beneith you, but just look at you, any such claim is obvious BS.
Great piece though, the above is about my only quarrel with its excellence.
The pinnacle of that system isn't the 145 IQ wordcel. It's the 120 IQ dark triad nigga who can act impulsively and lie his ass off without any cognitive load. Unless you want to be a chess grandmaster or theoretical physicist or write weird mythopoetic screeds on the internet then IQ is not what you want to optimize for at all, which is lowkey kind of the main thesis here in a roundabout way.
Wait, but if we accept the foundation of the system is just “governing” narratives and accepted “truths” and morality frameworks, then even if those are currently optomized to 120 IQ dark triad people, the framework itself is editable by the 145 IQ mythopoetic writers, because that is how such frameworks are made.
For a lame metaphore, if this is an MMO and the 120 IQ dark triads are the maxed out players, the 145 IQ mythopetic writers should be the devs and the sysadmins. Its a more subtle and indirect power in regards to the actual game, sure, but it is ultimately the freater power as it long-term defines the game itself.
Fair enough.
Tiptop explanatory and predictive power - you, sir, are a credit to your fellow man. I would also add a sort of complex/systems psychology/Jungian angle that comes to mind. Essentially, it is possible to have a different degrees of agency and Will in different circumstances or aspects of life. For instance, a woman could be incredibly diachronically agentic with regards to money and finances (perhaps due to her combination of intelligence, upbringing, prior trauma, or fear) but remain a teenager vis-a-vis romantic entanglements, which is of course the main subject here and the most energetically-charged, basal aspect of the psyche (right after basic survival).
I have a hell of a difficult time understanding you. I'm a shape rotator - not a wordcel So, I copy and paste your posts into Ai and ask it to help me understand. The translation may not be perfect, but, assuming it is reasonably accurate, your assessment is spot on target, so very coherent.
I suspect you write in the way you do because, in part, you want to be inaccessible. I don't understand the tactic. Maybe it is a status signal. Discussing these topics is inherently low status. So, maybe it makes sense to obfuscate in order to appear higher status?
It's unironically kind of just how I think lol
Copy pasting this article into chatGPT to reduce verbosity and autisticness
All true
Also true: that’s one amoral, dishonest, lazy bitch — and I’m relieved it never progressed farther than it did. Her punishment will be lifelong loneliness and despair
It's interesting how this piece approaches the concept of female agency. How does a framework centered on game theory contribute to fostering geniune, equitable relationships built on mutual respect and accountability for all individuals?
Interesting. However, what if I never read your article?