Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kryptogal (Kate, if you like)'s avatar

Holy shit. This is apex insane genius shizophreic but all makes sense level. Guess I'm in that rabbit hole. My only issue when you do these is you put too much in for proper digestion (sorry, me being exhausted). But like it's hard to pick how many sentences here one reads here and thinks "I can't believe that is a sentence" but also simultaneously deep knowledge and frippery.

I'll just pick one, but seriously:

"Sometimes Art Hoes who are ostensibly dumb and retarded will be correct about things in a way that initially will feel specious / empty cause their little ginies and nips and shit are picking up on subconscious lower order frequencies not legible to syllogistic and phallic propositional manlogic."

Being an odd-numbered age always feels weird and wrong. Specially for a Libra. 😉

Expand full comment
Sebastian Jensen's avatar

>Just about everyone in creation is hugely motivated by status—especially the folks who insist they don’t care about status (which invariably means they’re operating in some photonegative / stack overflow hierarchy)

My read on the overtly pursuing status/wealth debate is that it is muddled by:

1. Resentful proles who don't have and will never get either

2. People who are pursuing status/wealth but find being explicit about it declasse or autistic/ADHD coded.

Because of that, a lot of the genuine "anti-striving" arguments (listed below) are written off by others as muddying the waters or simply being unenlightened.

1. People who are doing something purely for the purposes of status/wealth will do it worse than people who like it for the thing in itself + the status/wealth it brings -- status/wealth motivation plays a role in everything but being motivated by something for its own sake is rare and valuable. "Follow your passion" is good advice for people who want to be outliers.

2. Subcultures that fill up with people who are only in it for status, wealth, or social relationships often deteriorate because what people originally found compelling about said subculture is no longer appreciated by a substantial fraction of the people inside it.

3. Analysing everything through the lens of status is uninteresting and circular. E.g. saying people engage in a competition because they want to compete is a bad explanation because it doesn't explain why people are engaging in that specific competition and not a different one.

Personally, I am asocial and don't care that much about status for its own sake, and whenever I do things to increase my own status it's usually for the purposes of collecting something else. I am strongly and unashamedly motivated by wealth because I want to be free from ZOG/capitalism/neofeudalism and the only way to do that is to get fuck you money.

Also I really like the term "photonegative hierarchy".

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts